Ats

What is Resume Parsing?

Definition: Resume parsing is the automated process of extracting and categorizing information from resume documents into structured data fields, enabling Applicant Tracking Systems and recruiting software to store, search, and analyze candidate information.

Also known as: CV Parsing, Resume Data Extraction, Resume Parser

Quick Summary

TL;DR

Resume parsing is the automated process of extracting structured data (name, contact info, work history, education, skills) from unstructured resume documents. ATS and recruiting software use parsing to populate candidate databases, enable searching, and automate screening. Parsing accuracy depends heavily on resume formatting.

85-95% accuracy
for well-formatted resumes

Key Facts

What It Does

Extracts data from resumes

Core function

Accuracy Range

60-95% depending on format

Industry benchmarks

Used By

ATS, CRM, Job Boards

Technology adoption

Failure Cause

Poor resume formatting

Parsing analysis

Why Resume Parsing Accuracy Matters

Recruiters rely on parsed data to search candidates, match to jobs, and generate reports. When parsing fails, candidate information is incomplete or incorrect—skills may be missed, job titles garbled, or contact info lost. This causes qualified candidates to be overlooked, ruins database integrity, and creates manual work to correct errors. For staffing agencies processing hundreds of resumes, parsing problems compound quickly.

Common Pain Points

  • 1Qualified candidates overlooked due to parsing errors
  • 2Manual data entry to correct parser mistakes
  • 3Incomplete candidate profiles in ATS databases
  • 4Search and match features returning inaccurate results

How Resume Parsing Works

Understanding parsing helps you optimize resumes for better accuracy.

  1. 1

    Document Intake

    The parser receives a resume file (PDF, DOCX, etc.) and converts it to processable text, stripping formatting.

  2. 2

    Section Identification

    AI/rules identify sections: contact info, summary, experience, education, skills. Standard headings help accuracy.

  3. 3

    Field Extraction

    Within each section, specific fields are extracted: company names, job titles, dates, degree types, skill keywords.

  4. 4

    Data Normalization

    Extracted data is standardized (date formats, job title matching) and stored in structured database fields.

Result

Better resume formatting leads to better parsing, which leads to better candidate data.

Resume Parsing Deep Dive

Parsing Technology Types

Modern resume parsers use three approaches: rule-based (pattern matching for known formats), statistical (machine learning trained on resume data), and AI/NLP (natural language processing for context understanding). Most commercial parsers combine all three. AI-based parsers handle varied formats better but still struggle with creative designs.

Rule-Based
Pattern matchingFastest, least flexible
Statistical
ML-trained modelsGood accuracy, trained data dependent
AI/NLP
Context understandingMost flexible, resource intensive

What Breaks Parsing

Common parsing failures: headers/footers (often ignored by parsers), tables (content extracted in wrong order), text boxes (may not extract at all), images with text (completely invisible), unusual fonts (may not render), PDF created from scans (requires OCR which adds errors), and non-standard section headings (parser doesn't know where to put data).

Parsing for Staffing Agencies

Staffing agencies face unique parsing challenges. They receive resumes in every format imaginable from candidates. Before adding to their ATS or submitting to clients, these resumes need to parse accurately. Many agencies reformat incoming resumes to a standard template specifically to ensure clean parsing into their systems.

Common Misconceptions

  • All resume parsers work equally well
  • PDF is always better than Word for parsing
  • Modern AI parsers can read any format
  • Parsing errors only affect candidate data entry

Parsing Accuracy by Resume Format

How format affects parsing success
Format TypeParsing AccuracyCommon IssuesRecommendation
Simple .docx90-95%FewBest choice
Simple PDF85-92%Text extractionGood choice
Creative design60-75%Layout confusionAvoid for ATS
Scanned/image PDF50-70%OCR errorsConvert first
Multi-column65-80%Wrong orderAvoid

How format affects parsing success

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Ensure Perfect Parsing Every Time

iReformat creates resumes optimized for ATS parsing

Enterprise-grade securitySetup in minutesNo credit card required