Format Resumes for ApplicantPro ATS Clients
Submit candidates to clients using ApplicantPro with confidence. Bulk format resumes for perfect parsing and faster placements.
Client-Required Format
PDF, .docx, .doc, or .txt recommended for best parsing
Max File Size
Check current documentation - limit not publicly specified
Typical Clients
Information not found - verify with current market analysis
Quick Summary
TL;DRWhen your clients use ApplicantPro ATS, poorly formatted candidate resumes get rejected due to parsing issues. iReformat ensures your submissions are ApplicantPro-compatible, preventing lost placements from formatting problems.
Key Facts
Client-Required Format
PDF, .docx, .doc, or .txt recommended for best parsing
ApplicantPro Documentation
Max File Size
Check current documentation - limit not publicly specified
ApplicantPro Help Center
Typical Clients
Information not found - verify with current market analysis
Industry analysis
Why Clients Use It
Specific strengths not found - check current reviews
G2 Reviews
The Challenge: Submitting Candidates to ApplicantPro Clients
Staffing agencies face a critical challenge when submitting candidates to clients using ApplicantPro. Complex formatting, graphics, columns, tables, and non-standard fonts can cause parsing failures or poor display in the client's ATS. Image-based PDFs and uncommon formats like .jpg, .png, .rtf, .odt, or .pages often result in complete rejection. When your carefully sourced candidates get filtered out due to formatting issues rather than qualifications, you lose placements and risk damaging client relationships. The conversion differences between file types can dramatically affect how resumes appear in your client's system.
Common Pain Points
- 1Complex formatting with columns and tables causes parsing failures
- 2High-volume submissions require individual formatting for each client's ATS
- 3Client relationships suffer when candidates get rejected for technical reasons
- 4Time wasted reformatting the same resume for different client systems
How iReformat Prepares Candidate Resumes for ApplicantPro
iReformat transforms messy candidate resumes into ApplicantPro-compatible formats, ensuring your submissions parse correctly and reach hiring managers.
- 1
Bulk Upload Candidate Resumes
Upload resumes in any format - complex PDFs, outdated Word docs, or poorly formatted files from candidates.
- 2
AI Reformats for ApplicantPro
Remove problematic elements like columns, graphics, and complex formatting that cause ApplicantPro parsing issues.
- 3
Apply Agency Branding
Add your agency logo and consistent styling to maintain professional presentation across all client submissions.
- 4
Export Client-Ready Files
Download in PDF or DOCX formats optimized for ApplicantPro parsing, ready for immediate submission.
Result
Save 3-5 minutes per submission while ensuring candidates reach hiring managers instead of getting filtered out by formatting issues.
What Staffing Agencies Need to Know About ApplicantPro
How ApplicantPro Processes Your Candidate Submissions
When you submit candidate resumes to ApplicantPro clients, the system must parse and convert the files for display in their interface. Parsing technology details are not publicly available, but like most ATS platforms, ApplicantPro likely uses text extraction algorithms that struggle with complex layouts. Various file types used for conversion can significantly affect how resumes appear to your clients. Understanding this process helps explain why some candidates seem to 'disappear' after submission - they're often victims of poor parsing rather than lack of qualifications.
File Formats Your ApplicantPro Clients Accept
ApplicantPro accepts various resume file types, but compatibility issues may arise due to conversion differences between formats. While specific formats like PDF or DOCX are not explicitly listed in available documentation, general ATS best practices recommend PDF, .docx, .doc, or .txt for optimal parsing results. The key is choosing formats that maintain text readability while avoiding complex visual elements that confuse parsing algorithms.
Why Candidate Submissions Get Rejected in ApplicantPro
The most common rejection reasons stem from formatting incompatibility rather than candidate qualifications. Graphics, columns, tables, non-standard fonts, and uncommon formats like .jpg, .png, .rtf, .odt, or .pages frequently cause parsing failures. Image-based PDFs are particularly problematic as they appear as pictures rather than searchable text. Complex formatting elements that look professional to human eyes often create chaos in ATS parsing, causing qualified candidates to be automatically filtered out before reaching hiring managers.
Resume Format Performance When Submitting to ApplicantPro
| Format Type | Parsing Success | Common Rejection Reasons | Use This? |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDF (single-column) | Best | Minimal parsing issues | Recommended |
| DOCX (simple layout) | Good | Occasional font rendering issues | Acceptable |
| PDF (two-column) | Poor | Text extraction confusion, content mixing | Avoid |
| Image-based PDF | Very Poor | No text extraction possible | Never use |
| RTF/ODT/Pages | Poor | Uncommon format parsing failures | Avoid |
Recommendations for staffing agency submissions
Frequently Asked Questions About ApplicantPro ATS
Related Resources
Stop Losing Placements to Formatting Issues
Format candidate resumes for any client ATS in seconds