Why This Comparison Matters
If you're a staffing agency evaluating resume formatting tools, iReformat and Allsorter are likely on your shortlist. Both promise to eliminate the manual formatting grind that eats up 15-20 hours of recruiter time per week. But they approach the problem differently, and the right choice depends on your specific workflow.
We're going to be honest here. As the iReformat team, we obviously believe in our product — but we also know Allsorter does some things well. This comparison covers real differences, not marketing spin.
Quick Overview: iReformat vs Allsorter
Feature Comparison: iReformat vs Allsorter
| Feature | iReformat | Allsorter |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Powered Parsing | Advanced NLP engine | Standard parsing |
| Batch Processing | Unlimited bulk uploads | Batch available |
| Template Customization | Full custom templates | Limited customization |
| Bullhorn Integration | Deep native integration | Basic integration |
| ATS Integrations | 50+ ATS platforms | Multiple ATS |
| GDPR Compliance | SOC2 + GDPR | GDPR compliant |
| Candidate Anonymization | Built-in blind formatting | Available |
| Free Trial | 15-day free trial | Free trial available |
| Primary Market | US + Global | Australia/UK + Global |
| Pricing Transparency | Published pricing | Quote-based for enterprise |
Comparison based on publicly available information as of February 2026
Parsing and AI Capabilities
Resume parsing accuracy is the foundation of any formatting tool. If the parser misidentifies a job title as a company name, the output is useless no matter how pretty the template is.
iReformat uses a proprietary NLP engine trained on over 1 million resumes from staffing agencies. This means it understands recruiter-specific formats — candidate summaries, skills matrices, project-based experience sections — that generic parsers often struggle with. The AI continuously improves as it processes more resumes.
Allsorter provides reliable parsing that handles most standard resume formats well. Their parsing works across PDF, Word, and text formats. For straightforward resumes with conventional layouts, Allsorter's parsing is solid.
When it matters: If your agency handles complex resumes (executive CVs, technical professionals with project-based experience, or international formats), AI parsing quality becomes the differentiator.
Template Customization
Your branded template is your agency's identity in every client submission. Both tools offer template customization, but the depth differs significantly.
iReformat allows fully custom templates — you control headers, footers, section ordering, typography, colors, logos, and page layouts. Agencies can create multiple templates for different clients or industries. The template builder supports conditional sections (show/hide based on content availability).
Allsorter offers template customization within their framework. You can adjust branding elements and basic layout options, but the customization depth is more constrained. For agencies with standard template needs, this may be sufficient.
ATS Integration Depth
For US-based staffing agencies, Bullhorn integration is often the deciding factor. iReformat offers a deep Bullhorn integration that works within the recruiter's existing workflow — format resumes without leaving Bullhorn. The integration handles candidate record linking, formatted document storage, and submission tracking.
Allsorter integrates with multiple ATS platforms and has presence in the Bullhorn Marketplace, but the integration depth varies. Agencies using other ATS platforms (JobDiva, Crelate, Vincere) should evaluate both tools' specific integration capabilities for their system.
Pricing Comparison
Pricing is where many agencies make their final decision. Based on publicly available information:
Allsorter pricing starts at approximately $2,140 per year for 100 resumes per month. Enterprise plans with higher volumes are available on a quote basis. Additional features like advanced anonymization may require higher tiers.
iReformat offers competitive pricing with transparent tiers based on volume. The 15-day free trial includes full access to all features, so you can test with real resumes before committing. Contact our team for current pricing details.
ROI perspective: At $25-75 per manually formatted resume (based on recruiter hourly rates), even 50 resumes per month justifies the cost of either tool. The question isn't whether to automate — it's which tool fits your workflow better.
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose iReformat if:
- You need deep Bullhorn integration for your US-based staffing workflow
- Template customization is critical — you have different templates for different clients
- You process complex resumes (executive, technical, international formats)
- You need bulk formatting for high-volume recruiting
- GDPR/SOC2 compliance is a requirement for your enterprise clients
Choose Allsorter if:
- Your agency is primarily based in Australia or the UK
- You need a straightforward formatting tool without complex customization needs
- Standard template options meet your branding requirements
- You prefer an established brand with a longer track record in the APAC market
The Bottom Line
Both iReformat and Allsorter solve the same core problem: eliminating the hours recruiters spend manually formatting resumes. The right choice depends on your agency's specific needs — ATS ecosystem, template requirements, volume, and market focus.
We'd encourage you to try both. iReformat offers a free 15-day trial with no credit card required, so you can test with your actual resumes and templates before making a decision.