How We Evaluated These Tools
We compared these five tools across the criteria that matter most to staffing agencies: formatting speed, template customization, ATS/CRM integration, pricing accessibility, and ease of setup. Our evaluation draws from hands-on testing, customer feedback from 600+ agencies, and published product documentation.
1. iReformat — Best Overall for SMB Agencies
iReformat is an AI-powered resume formatting tool built specifically for staffing agencies. It takes any resume format (PDF, Word, or even images) and converts it into a branded, client-ready document in under 60 seconds.
- Strengths: Fastest formatting speed (under 60 seconds), full template customization with drag-and-drop editor, AI-powered layout intelligence, blind CV anonymization, affordable pricing for any agency size
- Limitations: Less advanced parsing than Daxtra/Textkernel, fewer enterprise CRM integrations than Allsorter
- Best for: Small-to-mid agencies (1-200 recruiters) whose primary need is fast, branded formatting
- Pricing: Transparent monthly pricing. No enterprise minimums or annual contracts required.
Why agencies choose iReformat: It does one thing — resume formatting — and does it faster and more affordably than any competitor. 600+ agencies trust it for over 1 million formatted resumes.
2. Allsorter — Best for Enterprise Workflows
Allsorter is a resume formatting and management platform popular with enterprise staffing firms. It offers template-based formatting, document management, and workflow automation.
- Strengths: Established enterprise platform, deep Bullhorn integration, workflow automation features, compliance tools
- Limitations: Higher pricing ($2,140+/year entry point), slower formatting than AI-powered tools, template customization requires support assistance, dated user interface
- Best for: Enterprise agencies (50+ recruiters) with complex workflow and compliance requirements
- Pricing: Starts at $2,140/year (~$178/month). Enterprise tiers significantly higher.
3. Daxtra Styler — Best for Parsing-Heavy Workflows
Daxtra Styler is the formatting module within Daxtra's broader parsing and search platform. It reformats parsed resume data into templates.
- Strengths: Industry-leading parsing engine (40+ languages), deep CRM integrations (20+), part of comprehensive Daxtra suite, semantic search capabilities
- Limitations: Formatting is secondary to parsing, limited template customization, enterprise pricing ($500+/month), complex setup
- Best for: Agencies that need advanced parsing AND formatting in one platform
- Pricing: Enterprise pricing starting at $500+/month. Typically bundled with parsing and search.
4. Textkernel — Best for Labor Market Intelligence
Textkernel (owned by CareerBuilder) offers resume parsing, candidate matching, and labor market intelligence. Formatting is available as a feature within their parsing pipeline.
- Strengths: 29 languages, semantic AI matching, labor market data (Jobfeed), extensive enterprise integrations (SAP, Oracle, 100+)
- Limitations: Formatting is not the primary product, expensive enterprise pricing ($1,000-10,000+/month), long implementation timeline (weeks to months), overkill for formatting-only needs
- Best for: Enterprise organizations needing a full HR data platform, not just formatting
- Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Typically $1,000-$10,000+/month depending on modules.
5. Kyloe — Best for Bullhorn-Native Agencies
Kyloe (a Bullhorn company) provides resume formatting that's deeply integrated into the Bullhorn ATS. It's designed to work natively within Bullhorn workflows.
- Strengths: Native Bullhorn integration (owned by Bullhorn), no context-switching between tools, familiar interface for Bullhorn users
- Limitations: Only works with Bullhorn (not portable to other ATS), limited template customization compared to dedicated tools, formatting capabilities are basic compared to AI-powered alternatives
- Best for: Agencies exclusively using Bullhorn who want built-in formatting without a separate tool
- Pricing: Bundled with Bullhorn or available as add-on. Pricing through Bullhorn sales.
Comparison Summary
Resume Formatting Tools Comparison Matrix
| iReformat | Allsorter | Daxtra | Textkernel | Kyloe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Format speed | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Template control | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Parsing depth | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ |
| CRM integrations | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Pricing (SMB) | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Ease of setup | ★★★★★ | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Best for | SMB agencies | Enterprise | Parsing needs | HR platform | Bullhorn users |
How to Choose
Your decision should start with your primary pain point:
- "We need to format resumes faster" → iReformat. Purpose-built for speed and branded output.
- "We need enterprise workflow automation" → Allsorter. Deep workflow and compliance features for large teams.
- "We need advanced resume parsing" → Daxtra. Industry-leading parsing with formatting included.
- "We need an HR data platform" → Textkernel. Parsing, matching, and market intelligence in one suite.
- "We live in Bullhorn" → Kyloe. Native integration, no context-switching. But limited formatting features.
For most small-to-mid staffing agencies, the bottleneck is formatting speed and brand consistency — not parsing depth or labor market data. That's why 600+ agencies have chosen iReformat.